#2933

docs(changelog): 29 October notes the affected models list in retired model routing settings

OpenDanielButler1wants to merge intofrom

What changed

  • The October changelog gets a 29 October date with one Product entry for #3357: Settings -> Routing -> Retired model routing now lists Your affected models, with each model's replacement, price comparison and redirect outcome, plus Choose replacement. It links to the guide's "See which of your models are affected" section.
  • The same entry is in all 8 translations, using each language's labels from the settings page and the 24 October entry. Translation freshness is recorded for each page.

Why

The user asked whether retired model routing was in the changelog on the right dates. Checking the changelog on main against the related PRs showed:

  • The launch (24 October), the price rule (#3211) and the 410 behaviour (15 October) were already there, on the right dates.
  • #3357, merged 2026-10-29 12:46 UTC, had no entry, and there was no 29 October date at all.

The user asked to add #3357. Retirements such as Solar Pro 3 (#3223) are left out on purpose: the user said the changelog doesn't log them.

How

  • The new <Update label="October 29, 2026"> with a Product section goes above 28 October in each language's v1/changelog.mdx.
  • The date is #3357's merge date (UTC), as the changelog guide says.
  • The sparkle and field fix (#3374) has no entry, because it's a small interface tweak.

Before and after

BeforeAfter
29 October in the changelogno dateProduct: "Settings -> Routing -> Retired model routing lists Your affected models: each model your workspace used in the last 90 days that is being retired or is no longer served, with its replacement, how the price compares, and whether its requests are redirected and, if not, why. Choose replacement sets your own replacement for a model…"

Verification

  • node apps/docs/scripts/validate-changelog.mjs → Changelog format valid: 18 pages, 452 dates, 600 sections, 9 languages.
  • node scripts/translation-freshness.mjs check (in apps/docs) → Translation pages match the recorded English source versions.
  • node scripts/validate-locales.mjs → valid: 655 pages across 8 locales.
  • node apps/web/scripts/generate-docs-search.mjs --check → verified 637 documentation pages (no index change needed).
  • The guide anchor see-which-of-your-models-are-affected exists in English and in all 8 locale guides.
  • Not checked: I didn't run the rendered page in local Mintlify. The entry uses the same markup as the dates around it.

Model: Claude Opus 5.5 (medium effort) · Harness: Claude Code in T3 Code

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Activity

5
vercel[bot]1d ago

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

1 Skipped Deployment
ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated
phaseo SkippedOct 29, 2026 4:55pm UTC

coderabbitai[bot]1d ago

WARNING

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 20 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 40e2fc72-5b12-4bc0-9f8f-203da10f92c1
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e05110665418a8223dd1ab2f8f0f3b903fc8c4ea and 76f6a90d30e5e9adf3d8cbed41d42d33e2fba2fa.

Files selected for processing: 10
  • apps/docs/ar/v1/changelog.mdx
  • apps/docs/de/v1/changelog.mdx
  • apps/docs/es/v1/changelog.mdx
  • apps/docs/fr/v1/changelog.mdx
  • apps/docs/hi/v1/changelog.mdx
  • apps/docs/ja/v1/changelog.mdx
  • apps/docs/pt-BR/v1/changelog.mdx
  • apps/docs/translation-status.json
  • apps/docs/v1/changelog.mdx
  • apps/docs/zh-Hans/v1/changelog.mdx
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]1d ago

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

ReviewStatusCommitReview trigger
📝 Code Review✅ Completed 2026-10-29T16:57:05.513966Z76f6a90PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.