License clarification: no LICENSE file in repository

Hi vercel-labs team,

I'm using next-best-practices and next-cache-components from this repo (installed via npx skills) in a private project, and I'd like to confirm the licensing terms before I commit them to my repository as versioned files.

I noticed that:

• This repo (vercel-labs/next-skills) doesn't appear to have a LICENSE file at the root, nor a license declaration in the README.
• The README states "Each skill follows the Agent Skills open standard" and links to anthropics/skills (which is permissively licensed), implying the skills here are intended for downstream use.
• Your sister repo vercel-labs/agent-skills ships with an explicit MIT LICENSE file.

Could you confirm:

1. Is vercel-labs/next-skills intended to be MIT-licensed (matching agent-skills), and the missing LICENSE file is an oversight?
2. Or is there a different intended license?

If MIT is the intent, adding a LICENSE file would unblock downstream consumers like me. Happy to send a PR if helpful.

Thanks!